Saxton

Saxton v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20233:21-cv-09499California2,257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATRINA MCGINNIS, Case No. 22-cv-06632-SI Related Case No. 21-cv-09499 SI Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint is scheduled for a hearing on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that a hearing is unnecessary and that the motion can be resolved on the briefing. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. The Court dismisses the claims against Sheriff Essick and the Sheriff’s Department WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court dismisses the first and second causes of action WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The amended complaint shall be filed by April 4, 2023. The case management conference scheduled for April 7, 2023 in this case and the Saxton case is rescheduled to April 14, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.