Stanford Health Care v. Trustmark Services Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20233:22-cv-03946California2,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANFORD HEALTH CARE,

Case No. 22-cv-03946-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS TRUSTMARK SERVICES COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Stanford Health Care (“Stanford”) filed this diversity action against Defendants Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. (“Trustmark”),1 and The Chefs’ Warehouse, Inc. (“TCW”). The full background has been described previously and need not be repeated at length here. See Dkt. 42 (“MTD Order”), at 2. In essence, Plaintiff avers it provided emergency medical services to “beneficiaries of a health insurance plan sponsored, administered and/or funded by Defendants,” (“the TCW Plan”), but that Defendants have failed to pay the full amounts billed by Plaintiff. Dkt. 44 (“SAC”) ¶ 10. After its First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was dismissed, Plaintiff filed the operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.