Olukoya

Olukoya v. Badejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20234:20-cv-08001California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL KOLAWOLE OLUKOYA, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08001-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. Re: Dkt. No. 31 MAUREEN BADEJO, et al., Defendants.

12 The Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment and dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction on May 6, 2021. See generally Dkt. No. 26 (“Order”). Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Order. Dkt. No. 31 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-9(a) provides as follows:

Before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all of the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties in a case, any party may make a motion before a Judge requesting that the Judge grant the party leave to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.