Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20235:22-cv-01427California4,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RESH, INC, Case No. 5:22-cv-01427-EJD

Plaintiff, GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

SKIMLITE MANUFACTURING INC, et Re: Dkt. No. 19 al., 12 Defendants.

13 This patent infringement action involves two manufacturers of telescoping poles used to clean swimming poles. Defendants Skimlite Manufacturing Inc. (“Skimlite”), James Conrad, and Barrett Conrad move to dismiss the Complaint on Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(3) grounds, as well as to strike paragraphs 140–222 for immateriality. Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 19. On October 25, 2022, the Court took the fully briefed Motion under submission without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Skimlite Manufacturing Inc. is a California corporation principally owned by father and son Defendants James Conrad (“Conrad Sr.”) and Barrett Conrad (“Conrad Jr.”). Compl.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.