Oyster Optics, LLC v. Ciena Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20234:17-cv-05920California325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OYSTER OPTICS, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-05920-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

OYSTER-FUJITSU SETTLEMENT

v. AGREEMENT SHOULD BE FILED

UNDER SEAL IN ITS ENTIRETY AND

CIENA CORPORATION, INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES Defendant.

12 In addition to the motions for summary judgment and motions to exclude expert testimony, the parties have filed motions to seal portions of those briefs and exhibits in support of their positions. One of those exhibits is a settlement agreement between Oyster Optics LLC and Fujitsu Ltd. and Fujitsu Network Communications (the “OFA”). (Dkt. No. 177-54.) Oyster is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why that exhibit should remain under seal in its entirety. See Oyster Optics, LLC v. Coriant Am., Inc., No. 16-cv-01302-RJG, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236708, at *5-*9 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 4, 2018). The Court FURTHER ORDERS the parties to meet and confer regarding all pending motions to seal. To assist…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.