Alexander

Alexander v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20234:23-cv-00011California1,297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT J. ALEXANDER, Case No. 23-cv-00011-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILATION, et al., Defendants. 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.