In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20235:19-cv-04286California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ASIF KUMANDAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO SEAL

GOOGLE LLC, et al., [Re: ECF No. 384] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Google’s Further Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. See Mot., ECF No. 384. The motion requests to seal portions of one of Google’s expert’s reports. See Mot. at 1-2. The Court previously denied Google’s request to seal the report because the request was not narrowly tailored. See ECF No. 383, at 6:16-21. For the reasons stated below, Google’s further motion to seal is GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.