Oiyemhonlan
Oiyemhonlan v. Aramark Management Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND OIYEMHONLAN, Case No. 22-cv-02954-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND AND
v. REMANDING CASE
ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Re: Dkt. No. 30 INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Raymond Oiyemhonlan’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 30. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion for leave and REMANDS the action to state court. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this case. Plaintiff initially filed this action in San Francisco County Superior Court in March 2022. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff alleged that he was wrongfully terminated by Defendant Aramark Facility Services, LLC based on his age and national origin. See generally Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. A. He alleged that…