Goldstein

Clark v. Goldstein

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20233:22-cv-02962California2,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LOUREECE STONE CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-02962-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; GRANTING

v. REQUEST FOR COPY

MARK H. GOLDSTEIN, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 17)

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a detainee at Napa State Hospital (“NSH”) who is proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against four Marin County officials --- James H. Kim, Robert Doyle, Jaime Scardina, and Shelly Marie Scott -- - and one other individual, Mark Goldstein. The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend, and Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons explained below, the case is DISMISSED because the amended complaint does not state a claim that is capable of being judicially heard and decided. BACKGROUND The following allegations are set forth in the amended complaint. 21 Plaintiff alleges that on April 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.