Malberg

Malberg v. McCracken

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20235:22-cv-01713California4,783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARTIN MALBERG, Case No. 5:22-cv-01713-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

v.

JOANNE MCCRACKEN, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 11, 12, 38 Defendants.

Pro se Plaintiff Martin Malberg brings this suit against Judge Joanne McCracken, Judge Christine Garcia-Sen (with Judge McCracken, the “Judicial Defendants”), the California Attorney General Rob Bonta, and the State of California (with Attorney General Bonta, the “State Defendants”). The Complaint arises from the issuance of a restraining order against Plaintiff initiated by his ex-wife pursuant to the California Domestic Violence Prevention Act. The Judicial Defendants and the State Defendants have each filed separate Motions to Dismiss. ECF Nos. 11 (“State Mot.”), 12 (“Judge Mot.”). Plaintiff has responded to both Motions in a single opposition, ECF No. 22 (“Opp.”), and both sets of Defendants have replied. ECF Nos. 23, 25. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.