LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20233:22-cv-04809California286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LED WAFER SOLUTIONS LLC, Case No. 22-cv-04809-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STAY; DENYING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 177, 178, 185 Defendants.

The motion to stay is granted. In deciding whether to stay a patent infringement case pending reexamination of the patents, courts consider (1) the phase of the litigation, including “whether discovery is complete and whether a trial date has been set; (2) whether a stay will simplify the issues in question and trial of the case; and (3) whether a stay would unduly prejudice or present a clear tactical disadvantage to the nonmoving party.” PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc., 69 F. Supp. 3d 1022, 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2014) (quoting Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc., 450 F.Supp.2d 1107, 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2006)). All three factors weigh in favor of staying this case: it is at a relatively early stage, reexamination of the patents would simplify the litigation, and LED Wafer Solutions has not shown any prejudice or clear tactical disadvantage that would result…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.