Alexander

Alexander v. Cuevo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20233:21-cv-05232California1,486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JIMMY LLOYD ALEXANDER, Case No. 21-cv-05232-WHO (PR)

Petitioner,

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW

v. CAUSE

DANIEL E. CUEVO, Respondent.

12 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Jimmy Lloyd Alexander seeks federal habeas relief from his state convictions for kidnapping, robbery, and rape. His second amended petition for habeas relief is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The second amended petition, which is now the operative petition in this action, states cognizable claims. Accordingly, on or before July 10, 2023, respondent shall file an answer or a dispositive motion in response to the claims raised in the operative habeas petition, with the exceptions described below. Alexander may not file any other petitions without obtaining leave of court before filing any petition. Any petition filed without obtaining prior leave of court will be summarily…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.