Ruiz

Ruiz v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20233:18-cv-07681California9,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IGNACIO RUIZ, Case No. 18-cv-07681-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

JUDGMENT

M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Docket No. 15 Defendant.

12 13 On August 13, 2020, this Court granted Petitioner Ignacio Ruiz’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction from Contra Costa County Superior Court. Docket No. 14 (“Order”). Respondent M. Eliot Spearman (“the government”) filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment and request for evidentiary hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Docket No. 15 (“MTA”). The Court granted the government’s request for an evidentiary hearing to determine what Daniel Cook, Mr. Ruiz’s trial counsel, advised Mr. Ruiz regarding (1) the likelihood of parole had Mr. Ruiz pled to two second- degree murder charges with indeterminate sentences of fifteen years to life, and (2) the availability of a defense at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.