Ames

Ames v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20234:23-cv-01080California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LINDA AMES, Case No. 23-cv-01080-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Self-represented Plaintiff Linda Ames filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1, 3.] The complaint alleges the following claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) related to the 2013 foreclosure of real property located at 10810 NW 13th Place, Vancouver, Washington 98685: 1) wrongful foreclosure; 2) violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act; 3) conversion; 4) fraud; 5) and civil conspiracy. Plaintiff alleges the complaint satisfies the requirements of diversity jurisdiction. Compl. ¶¶ 4-6. The court takes judicial notice of the fact that Ames previously filed a complaint against Wells Fargo in state court in Washington alleging similar claims related to the foreclosure and sale 20 of the same real property, i.e., 10810 NW 13th Place, Vancouver,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.