Armstrong-Harris
Armstrong-Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC ARMSTRONG-HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-07637-HSG
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.
12 This is a pro se action filed by Plaintiff Cedric Armstrong-Harris. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. moves to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 33 (“Mot.”). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brings this lawsuit against Defendants Wells Fargo and Specialized Loan Servicing. See Dkt. No. 32 (“FAC”). Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges the following: Plaintiff is the fee simple owner of a residential property in Oakland, California. Id. at 2, 13. In March 2007, a loan was taken out on the property and issued by World Savings Bank, which was later acquired by Wells Fargo. Id. at 2. Plaintiff entered into a loan…