Clark v. Marin County District Attorney

INTRODUCTION

13 Plaintiff, a detainee at Napa State Hospital (“NSH”), filed this civil rights complaint under 14 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Marin County District Attorney and a Deputy District Attorney. 15 (ECF No. 1 at 2.) Plaintiff filed 12 cases in this court, including this one, in approximately six 16 months. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For the 17 reasons explained below, the complaint is DISMISSED, and Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary 18 injunction and a subpoena duces tecum are DENIED

STANDARD OF REVIEW

20 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 21 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 22 1915A(a). The Court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of 23 24 1See Clark v. Goldstein, et al., No. C 22-2962 JSC; Clark v. Bay City Auto, et al., No. C 22-4066 25 JSC; Clark v. Internal Affairs Division of Marin Cty. Sherriff’s Dept., et al., No. C 22-4972 JSC; Clark v. Ahern, et al., No. C 22-6171 JSC; Clark v. Board of Equalization, No. C 22-6169 JSC; 26 Clark v. Supervisors for…