Arnold
Arnold v. United States Marshal Service
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIE ENCAR ARNOLD, Case No. 22-cv-09188-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT
v. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pro se Plaintiff Marie Encar Arnold filed a complaint and an application for leave to 13 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on December 30, 2022. [Docket Nos. 1, 3.] On January 3, 14 2023, the Honorable Laurel Beeler granted Plaintiff’s IFP application and noted that it would 15 determine separately whether the complaint should be served. [Docket No. 7.] Judge Beeler 16 subsequently referred this case to the undersigned to determine whether it is related to Arnold v. 17 United States Marshals Service, Case No. 21-cv-09738 DMR (the “2021 case”). [Docket No. 15.] 18 On February 15, 2023, the court determined that this case is related to the 2021 case and it was 19 reassigned to the undersigned. [Docket No. 16.] 20 Having reviewed the complaint, the court finds that the complaint fails to state a claim on 21 which…