Jain

Jain v. Unilodgers, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20233:21-cv-09747California5,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHIPRA JAIN, Case No. 21-cv-09747-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART RE: MOTION TO

DISMISS

UNILODGERS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 47 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss on behalf of Unilodgers, Inc. and Vaibhav Verma (“Defendants”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 47. Plaintiff Jain filed an Opposition (ECF No. 48) and Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 49). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the April 27, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND In September 2018, Defendant Unilodgers, Inc. (“Unilodgers”) was incorporated under the laws of Delaware with a principal place of business in Mill Valley,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.