Camenisch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHELA CAMENISCH, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05905-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER FOR

UMPQUA BANK, INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

13 Defendant.

15 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendant’s motion to certify for interlocutory appeal the order denying summary judgment is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing set for April 20, 2023, is vacated. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), a judge who is of the opinion that an otherwise non-appealable interlocutory order “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation” must “so state in writing in such order.” If the district court does so, the court of appeal may then “in its discretion, permit an appeal,” provided a party makes application to the…