Berry
Berry v. Parodi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BRYANNA BERRY, Case No. 21-cv-08436-VKD
Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS v. IN LIMINE NOS. 1-
SAN JOSE POLICE OFFICER LINDSAY Re: Dkt. No.
PARODI (4426),
12 Defendant.
13 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on April 12, 2023. Dkt. No. 71. This order resolves defendant Detective Lindsay Alvarez’s1 motions in limine. Dkt. No. 65.2 A. Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Roger Clark Detective Alvarez moves to exclude the proposed testimony of Ms. Berry’s expert, Roger Clark. Ms. Berry agrees that Mr. Clark should not be permitted to provide legal opinions, but contends that excluding his testimony in its entirety is drastic and unwarranted. The motion is granted in part and denied in part. Expert witnesses may give opinions if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of…