Thompson
Thompson v. Carmax
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENAN THOMPSON,
Case No. 23-cv-01364-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL
CARMAX,
10 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted his application. See Docket No. 4. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not state any claim, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff may file either an amended complaint or a response to this order addressing why his complaint is sufficient, no later than May 11, 2023. II. ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT1 Plaintiff brings this action against Defendant Carmax in connection with a “consumer credit transaction” he entered into with Carmax on July 26, 2022. Compl. at 6. In his “Statement of Facts[,]” Plaintiff alleges that Carmax:…