Malondondo

Stanley, Jr. v. Malondondo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20233:23-cv-00292California1,163 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR., Case No. 23-cv-00292-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SERVICE

v.

J. MALONDONDO, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court found that the original complaint stated a claim of excessive force against Maldonado for the July 26, 2022, incident, and a due process violation against defendant Lynch with respect to the disciplinary hearing. The remaining claims and defendants were dismissed with leave to amend to provide more information. The time to amend has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. CONCLUSION 1. The case continues against Maldonado and Lynch. All other defendants are DISMISSED. The Clerk will issue a summons and the United States Marshal will serve, without prepayment of fees, copies of the complaint (Dkt. No. 1) with attachments and copies of this order on Deputy J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.