Miron

Miron v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20235:22-cv-00900California7,552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY MIRON,

7 Case No. 22-0900 BLF (PR) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS;

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

R. MADDEN, Warden, APPEALABILITY; DIRECTIONS

TO CLERK

Respondent.

12 Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his 2018 criminal judgment. Dkt. No. 1 (“Petition”). Respondent filed an answer on the merits. Dkt. No. 9 (“Answer”). Petitioner filed a traverse. Dkt. No. 15 (“Traverse”). For the reasons set forth below, the petition is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A jury convicted Petitioner of three counts of lewd and lascivious conduct upon a child under the age of 14. See Ans., Ex. 1 (“Clerk’s Transcript”) at 216-18; see also Cal. Pen. Code, § 288(a). In addition, the trial court found that Petitioner had a prior sex offense, two prior serious felony convictions, two prior strikes, and three prison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.