Keegan
Washington v. Keegan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON LEVETTE WASHINGTON, Case No. 22-cv-03028-SI Plaintiff,
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA
Vv. PAUPERIS STATUS FOR APPEAL M. KEEGAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendants.
The Court dismissed the first amended complaint, which failed to correct deficiencies in the 14 || original complaint, failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and sought federal || court review of a state court judgment in violation of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See Reusser v. a || Wachovia Bank, N.A., 525 F.3d 855, 858 (9th Cir. 2008). An appeal is taken in “good faith” where it seeks review of any issue that is “non-frivolous.” Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). The “good faith” standard is an || objective one. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). “[A]n issue is frivolous if it has no arguable basis in fact or law.” …