Cortez

Cortez v. Hart

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20235:22-cv-06023California1,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JASON CORTEZ, Case No. 22-cv-06023 EJD (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE;

DISMISSING NON-COGNIZABLE

v. CLAIMS; OF SERVICE;

DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

JIM HART, et al., FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

Defendants. MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO

CLERK

11 (Docket No. 13) 12 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officers at the Santa Cruz County Jail (“Jail”), where he is currently confined. Dkt. No. 1. On March 27, 2023, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies with respect to several claims. Dkt. No. 12 at 6. In the alternative, Plaintiff could file a notice that he wishes to pursue only the cognizable claim of excessive force against Defendants Aisnworth and Seavers, and have all other claims and Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.