Lynch v. Matterport, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHAWN LYNCH, Plaintiff, No. C 22-03704 WHA
v.
MATTERPORT, INC, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND
Defendant.
15 An order previously granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss, dismissing all claims brought against individual directors and the putative class claims brought against defendant under the SAMP Act and Section 17500. That order allowed plaintiff to seek leave to amend within 18 days (Dkt. No. 34 at 12). Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion seeking leave to amend the dismissed claims, but another order denied that motion, having found that “[t]he amended claims against the individual directors remain inadequately individualized, and the amended putative class claims against Matterport under the SAMP Act and Section 17500 remain time-barred” (Dkt. No. 45 at 9). Plaintiff now moves for leave to amend the operative pleading for different reasons. Specifically, plaintiff seeks leave to amend…