Lunsford

Lunsford v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20235:21-cv-07654California4,440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 A.L., Case No. 21-cv-07654-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 17 Defendant.

Plaintiff appeals from the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 3, 9. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) and GRANTS Defendant Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 17). I. BACKGROUND On or about August 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed applications for Title II disability insurance benefits and Title XVI supplemental security income. See Dkt. 11 (Administrative Record (“AR”)) 288-306. On February 4, 2021, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Plaintiff’s 20 claims. AR 7-39 (the “ALJ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.