Shu

Shu v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20233:22-cv-04661California7,489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division SHARLENE SHU, MARK TENGOWSKI, Case No. 3:22-cv-04661-LB

ROMAN SIVION, AND MOHAMED

ALMAKALEH, individually and on behalf ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT of all others similar situated, Re: ECF No. 24 Plaintiffs, 14 v.

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA, INC.

AND TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH

AMERICA, INC.,

17 Defendants. 18 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action on behalf of a nationwide class, a California subclass, and a New York subclass, the plaintiffs allege that the Toyota defendants knowingly misrepresented that RAV4 SUVs came with an advanced-headlight feature (when in fact, they did not), and the plaintiffs relied on that misrepresentation in buying the RAV4s. The plaintiffs claim fraud, violations of state consumer-protection statutes, and breach of warranty. The defendants moved to dismiss the claims on the grounds that the plaintiffs (1) did not allege fraud with particularity under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.