Sauls

Sauls v. Balli

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20233:22-cv-06739California1,730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID L. SAULS, Case No. 22-cv-06739-WHO (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WARDEN OF CTF, et al., Defendants. Dkt. No. 3 12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David L. Sauls alleges that prison officials at CTF-Soledad violated his federal constitutional rights in various ways. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint on or before June 26, 2023. Sauls’s retaliation and endangerment claims are DISMISSED with leave to amend because he has not named any of the alleged defendants: without their names or much more specific information, it is impossible to serve them with the complaint and the case against them cannot proceed. Sauls’s claims regarding the mishandling of grievances, his misplaced television, and COVID protections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.