Clark v. Board of Equalization

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20233:22-cv-06169California1,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LOUREECE STONE CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-06169-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Loureece Stone Clark, a detainee at Napa State Hospital (“NSH”) who is proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the California State Board of Equalization. (ECF No. 1 at 2, 4.) In an approximately six-month period, Plaintiff filed 12 cases in this court. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in a separate order. For the reasons explained below, the complaint is DISMISSED. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.