Smith v. 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20233:20-cv-01968California3,759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH C. SMITH, Case No. 20-cv-01968-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS DEFENDANTS 9W HALO

9W HALO WESTERN OPCO L.P., et OPCO L.P., 9W HALO GP LLC, AND al., 9W HALO INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS L.P. Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 108

13 Before the court is a motion to dismiss defendants 9W Halo OpCo L.P., 9W Halo GP LLC, and 9W Halo Intermediate Holdings, L.P. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 4, 2023, is VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff worked as a non-exempt, hourly employee for defendant 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P. dba Angelica (“Angelica”) from approximately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.