Faizi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART FEE

APPLICATION

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 Defendants.

13 I. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2023, the Court granted in part and denied in part Mr. Faizi’s motion for an order finding defendants in contempt of the Court’s October 2022 preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 54. In that order, the Court found that “Falafel Flame may recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in connection with the present motion for contempt,” and set a briefing schedule for counsel’s anticipated application for fees and costs. Id. at 9, 10-11. Plaintiff’s counsel timely submitted their application, seeking $11,660.50 in fees for work performed by the Emran Law Firm, $5,805.00 for work performed by the Law Office of Kenneth Seligson, and $494.28 in costs incurred by the Emran Law Firm. …