Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Communication, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYPH, INC., Case No. 22-cv-00561-JSW Plaintiff,
ORDER CONDITIONALLY
V. GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
WITHDRAW AND REQUIRING
ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, STATUS REPORT INC. Re: Dkt. No. 105 Defendant.
E The Court has received the motion to withdraw as Plaintiff's counsel filed by Leena || Mauskar, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 19, 2023. When withdrawal by an || attorney from an action is not accompanied by simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel, || leave to withdraw may be subject to the condition that papers continue to be served on counsel i || unless and until the client appears by other counsel. See Civ. L.R. 11-5(b). As a corporation, Z || Cyph, Inc. cannot represent itself. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 || (1993); N.D. Civ. L.R. 3-9(b). Therefore, the Court grants the motion on the condition…