Spindel

Spindel v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20233:22-cv-03217California4,855 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JENETT S., Case No. 22-cv-03217-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 14 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff seeks Social Security benefits for a combination of physical and mental impairments, including spondylosis, depression, anxiety, degenerative disc disease (DDD), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her benefits claim. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 13-1, 14.) After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS for further proceedings consistent with this Order. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.