Refuerzo

Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20233:22-cv-00868California126 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RORESTE REFUERZO, Case No. 22-cv-00868-JSC Plaintiff, y. ORDER RE: PRIVILEGE DISPUTE Re: Dkt. No. 72 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CoO., ll Defendant. 12

The Court has reviewed in camera 23 email communications Defendant contends are 14 || protected by attorney-client privilege and as work product. (Dkt. No. 72; see Dkt. No. 69 at 5-6, || 7-8.) The Court concludes the communications are privileged. See Fed. R. Evid. 501; United a 16 || States v. Chen, 99 F.3d 1495, 1501-02 (9th Cir. 1996).

IT IS SO ORDERED. || Dated: April 21, 2023 20

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORL

United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28