Ketroser

Ketroser v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20233:19-cv-05231California8,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 DEIDRE KELLOGG KETROSER, Case No. 19-cv-05231-MMC

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION;

v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

7-ELEVEN, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

13 In this action, plaintiff Deidre Kellogg Ketroser (“Ketroser”) sues defendants 7-Eleven, Inc. and Southland Corporation (collectively, “7-Eleven”) for disability discrimination in connection with access barriers she encountered while visiting a 7-Eleven store located at 2500 San Ramon Valley Road in San Ramon, California (hereinafter, “the Store”). On November 7, 2022, the Court commenced a three-day bench trial on Ketroser’s claims against 7-Eleven. Irakli Karbelashvili and Irene Karbelashvili of AllAccess Law Group appeared on behalf of Ketroser. Michael Orr and Julie Trotter of Call & Jensen, APC, appeared on behalf of 7-Eleven. Thereafter, the parties made their closing arguments in writing (see Pltf.’s Br. in Supp. of Closing Arg.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.