Walker

Walker v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20235:22-cv-07442California2,823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases Case No. 22-mc-80066-WHO ______________________________

FIFTH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN

Re Case Nos.: 22-cv-5126-JSW, Mills v. PRO SE CASES; Broomfield; 22-cv-5349-TLT, Coles v. Allison; 22-cv-5477-JD, Bryant, Jr. v. Davis, FINDING DEFENDANT KELSO IS

ENTITLED TO QUASI-JUDICIAL

22-cv-5569-BLF, Shabazz v. Broomfield; 22- cv-07367-JD, O’Neal v. Allison; 22-cv- IMMUNITY AND THAT FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM ARGUMENTS

7442-JST, Walker v. Allison. LACK MERIT

I. INTRODUCTION The pro se cases identified above have been assigned to me by the Chief Judge of the Northern District of California for the following limited purpose: 1. Determining whether Clark Kelso has quasi-judicial immunity, and if not, some other defenses that he has raised such as whether he is a state actor who can be sued under section 1983; 2. Determining whether the defendants have immunity under the Public Readiness And Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act; …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.