Bruggeman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC Case No. 21-cv-08489-MMC

APPLIANCE CO., LTD.,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V.'S MOTION v. TO DISMISS 10 JOHN BRUGGEMAN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is defendant Signify Holding B.V.’s (“Signify”) “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6),” filed January 19, 2023, whereby Signify seeks dismissal of one of the claims in the Second Amended Verified Complaint (“SAC”), the operative pleading in the instant action. Plaintiff Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. (“Super Lighting”) has filed opposition, to which Signify has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 In the SAC, Super Lighting asserts a single cause of action against Signify for “Actual and Constructive Fraudulent Transfer of Patents” under the Delaware Uniform Fraudulent Transfer…