Clark v. Marin County Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20233:22-cv-07295California1,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

14 Petitioner, a detainee at Napa State Hospital (“NSH”), filed this petition for a writ of 15 habeas corpus against the Marin County Sheriff’s Department and several individuals who appear 16 to be judges and lawyers in Marin County who were involved in his criminal proceedings. (ECF 17 No. 1 at 2, 4.) Petitioner filed 12 cases in this court, including this one, in approximately six months. He is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons explained below, the 19 petition is DISMISSED, and the motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

21 This Court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in 22 custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in 23 24 1 See Clark v. Goldstein, et al., No. C 22-2962 JSC; Clark v. Bay City Auto, et al., No. C 22-4066 25 JSC; Clark v. Marin County District Attorney, et al., No. C 22-5557 JSC; Clark v. Ahern, et al., No. C 22-6171 JSC; Clark v. Board of Equalization, No. C 22-6169 JSC; Clark v. Supervisors for 26 Marin County, No. C 22-6173 JSC; Clark v. Medical Board of California, et al., No. C 22-6174…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.