Clark v. Marin County Sheriffs Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
INTRODUCTION
14 Petitioner, a detainee at Napa State Hospital (“NSH”), filed this petition for a writ of 15 habeas corpus against the Marin County Sheriff’s Department and several individuals who appear 16 to be judges and lawyers in Marin County who were involved in his criminal proceedings. (ECF 17 No. 1 at 2, 4.) Petitioner filed 12 cases in this court, including this one, in approximately six months. He is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons explained below, the 19 petition is DISMISSED, and the motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
21 This Court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in 22 custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in 23 24 1 See Clark v. Goldstein, et al., No. C 22-2962 JSC; Clark v. Bay City Auto, et al., No. C 22-4066 25 JSC; Clark v. Marin County District Attorney, et al., No. C 22-5557 JSC; Clark v. Ahern, et al., No. C 22-6171 JSC; Clark v. Board of Equalization, No. C 22-6169 JSC; Clark v. Supervisors for 26 Marin County, No. C 22-6173 JSC; Clark v. Medical Board of California, et al., No. C 22-6174…