Stanford Health Care v. Trustmark Services Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20233:22-cv-03946California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANFORD HEALTH CARE,

Case No. 22-cv-03946-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DISMISSING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT TRUSTMARK SERVICES COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

15 On March 31, 2023, Defendants’ motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint were granted. Plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract and quantum meruit were both dismissed with prejudice. Its claim under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), CAL. BUS. & PROD. CODE § 17200 et seq., was also dismissed, but with leave to amend “to the extent that Plaintiff can attempt to seek a remedy allowed under the UCL.” Dkt. 68, at 7. Plaintiff then filed its Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) that fails to include a UCL claim at all. See Dkt. 69. At this point, Plaintiff has been given ample opportunities to state a claim, and multiple explanations for why its claims were not pleaded adequately. It has repeatedly failed to do so. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.