Clark v. Commission on Judicial Performance

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20233:22-cv-06204California1,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

13 Plaintiff Loureece Stone Clark, a detainee at Napa State Hospital (“NSH”) who is 14 proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the 15 Commission on Judicial Performance, the State Bar of California, and three individuals Medical Board of California and three individuals. (ECF No. 1 at 2.) In an approximately six-month period, Plaintiff filed 12 cases in this court. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”) in a separate order. For the reasons explained below, the case is DISMISSED.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

20 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 21 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §

23 1 Plaintiff does not identify what governmental positions these defendants hold, but they appear to be judges in the Marin County Superior Court. (See ECF No. 1 at 2, 4, 21.) 24 2 See Clark v. Goldstein, et al., No. C 22-2962 JSC; Clark v. Bay City Auto, et al., No. C 22-4066 JSC; Clark v. Internal Affairs Dep’t. of Marin County Sherriff Dep’t., et al., No. C 22-4972…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.