El
El v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTONIO EL, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-00128-JD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.
12 Pro se plaintiffs Antonio El, Marie Mairiam Bijou Bayo-El, Amirah Marie Toni White-El, and Ali Mijan Muhammed White-Bey filed this action against over a dozen defendants, including the State of California, the State Bar of California, and multiple individuals. Dkt. No. 1. They also filed a single “short form” application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), signed only by Antonio El. Dkt. No. 2. The IFP request was denied without prejudice to plaintiffs refiling applications with their own statements of income and the like. Dkt. No. 12; see Remmert v. Newsome, No. 1:23-cv-00050-ADA-HBK, 2023 WL 1806277, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2023). Plaintiffs were directed to refile their IFP applications by April 21, 2023, or pay the filing fee by that same date. That deadline passed without any response or payment of the filing fee. El …