Senne

Senne v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20233:14-cv-00608California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 AARON SENNE, et al., Case No. 14-cv-00608-JCS Plaintiffs, 9 v. AMENDED ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING1

KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL

CORP., et al., Defendants.

13 14 15 The Court is in receipt of the joint letter submitted by Plaintiffs and the Objectors2 on the question of whether Plaintiffs’ counsel may depose the Objectors. Dkt. no.1194. In order to resolve this dispute, the Court seeks additional briefing as set forth below. First, the Court requests additional briefing on the question of whether the Objectors’ appeal will delay the payments and other non-monetary relief afforded to the class members under the Settlement Agreement. In particular, the parties should address Defendants’ response (dkt. no. 1195) to the joint letter, which argues that Objectors’ appeal will, unquestionably, delay the implementation of the settlement until after Objectors’ appeal is resolved under the term that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.