Armstrong-Harris
Armstrong-Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC ARMSTRONG-HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-07637-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.
12 On May 2, 2023, pro se Plaintiff Cedric Armstrong-Harris failed to appear at the case management conference set by the Court in its order on Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff did not file a case management statement as required, and Defendant represented that Plaintiff did not respond to attempts to meet and confer. See Dkt. No. 44 at 1. Plaintiff has consistently missed deadlines and failed to follow the Court’s instructions. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. I. DISCUSSION The district court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). “The authority of a court to dismiss sua sponte for lack of prosecution has generally been considered an ‘inherent…