Young

Young v. Schultz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20233:22-cv-05203California5,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACALYN A YOUNG, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05203-TSH

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

RONALD J SCHULTZ, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Ronald J. Schultz’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 25. Plaintiffs Jacalyn A. Young and Diane Lynn filed an Opposition (ECF No. 26) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 27). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs Young and Lynn reside in “The Woodlands,” a townhome complex in Santa Rosa, California. ECF No. 24 ¶¶ 3-5. Young and Lynn are members of The Woodlands Owners’ Association (“HOA”). Id. Defendant Schultz also resides in the Woodlands and is a member of the HOA. Id. ¶ 7. On multiple occasions between April 14, 2021…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.