Bryant

BGC, Inc. v. Bryant

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20233:22-cv-04801California580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BGC, INC., Case No. 22-cv-04801-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR SANCTIONS

KIMBERLY BRYANT, Re: Dkt. No. 64 Defendant.

12 On March 31, 2023, Plaintiff filed an emergency motion seeking to enforce the Court’s previously entered temporary restraining order. (Dkt. No. 54.1) On April 4, 2023, the Court granted BGC’s emergency motion, ordered Plaintiff to set up a new jointly-controlled account with Register.com, and ordered Ms. Bryant to transfer the relevant BGC domain names to the joint account. (Dkt. No. 58.) Three days later, BGC filed yet another emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and for contempt sanctions contending Ms. Bryant had failed to comply with the April 4 Order. (Dkt. No. 64.) At a hearing later that day, Plaintiff indicated it had learned shortly before the hearing that the domain names had been transferred to the joint account. Plaintiff’s motion for contempt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.