Raine
Raine v. Courtyard by Marriott-Pleasant Hill, Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATRECE RAINE, Case No. 21-cv-02187-MMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT- Re: Dkt. No.
PLEASANT HILL CORPORATION,
11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is defendant Courtyard Management Corporation’s (“Courtyard”)1 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed December 29, 2022, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Katrece Raine (“Raine”) has filed opposition, to which Courtyard has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.3 // // 20 1 Defendant states it was “erroneously sued as Courtyard by Marriott-Pleasant 21 Hill.” (See Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Def.’s Mot.”) at 1:5-6, Dkt. No. 51.) 22 2 Raine’s request to file a sur-reply is hereby DENIED. (See Pl’s Obj. to Def.’s Improper New Evid. Submitted for the First Time on Reply at 2:9-10, Dkt. No. 60.) 23…