Harris

Harris v. Door Dash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20233:21-cv-09445California1,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-09445-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

DOOR DASH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

10 Kevin Harris, who is proceeding without representation by a lawyer, sued DoorDash for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Defendant seeks to compel arbitration. Because the briefing exposed some ambiguity regarding contract formation, the Court requested additional briefing and evidence. Defendant submitted additional evidence and briefing. Plaintiff did not. After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. The parties agreed to arbitrate the claims at issue here. The matter is stayed pending the completion of arbitration. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Plaintiff alleges he worked as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.