Langmead

Apex.AI, Inc. v. Langmead

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20235:23-cv-02230California3,414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 APEX.AI, INC., Case No. 23-cv-02230-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR TRO AND

NEIL RICHARD LANGMEAD, an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY individual; VERIFA, INC., a Massachusetts PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION corporation; and CODECLINIC LLC dba SHOULD NOT ISSUE; AND SETTING LATTIX, a Massachusetts limited liability HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION company, FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants. [Re: ECF 6]

15 Plaintiff Apex.AI, Inc. (“Apex.AI”) filed the complaint in this action on May 8, 2023, asserting a federal trade secret claim against Defendants Neil Richard Langmead (“Langmead”), Verifa, Inc. (“Verifa”), and CodeClinic LLC dba Lattix (“CodeClinic”) under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1836. See Compl., ECF 1. Apex.AI also asserts state law claims for breach of contract, fraud, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.