Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20233:15-cv-02106California411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

BUREAU, Case No. 15-cv-02106-RS

Plaintiff,

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

v. SCHEDULE

NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY ADMINISTRATION, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 On consideration of the parties’ joint case management conference statement, the conference set for May 18, 2023, is vacated. The parties are in agreement that briefing should proceed at this time on the so-called “Seila Law” and “restitution” issues, but disagree as to whether briefing on the constitutionality of the CFPB’s funding should await the Supreme Court’s anticipated decision in Community Financial Services Ass’n of America, Ltd. v. CFPB, 51 F.4th 616 (5th Cir. 2022), cert. granted, 2023 WL 2227658 (U.S. Feb. 27, 2023) (No. 22-448). The parties also disagree as to page limits. Plaintiff proposes the normal motion practice limits should apply for each of the three issues. Defendants seek additional pages for both the Seila Law issue and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.